We are proud to be hosting a London Tech Week Fringe Event in partnership with Tech For Disability and Policy Connect.
Locked Out by Design: Financial Systems and the People They Were Never Built For
As the UK continues to move towards a more digital and cashless society, it is vital that financial systems work for everyone. Yet many disabled people continue to face barriers when accessing and using financial services, from digital platforms and identity verification processes to customer support and everyday banking.
At RIX, we believe that people with lived experience should be at the heart of designing the services, technologies, and policies that affect their lives. Inclusive innovation happens when diverse voices are listened to, valued, and meaningfully involved in shaping solutions.
We are delighted that members of the RIX team will be contributing to this important discussion:
- Paul Watts, Reader and Associate Professor at the University of East London, whose work focuses on inclusive research, participation, and social justice
- Ros Weinberg, who will bring the invaluable perspective of lived experience, helping to highlight the real-world impact that inaccessible systems can have on people’s everyday lives

Together with experts from technology, policy, research, and disability communities, the event will explore:
- How financial systems can unintentionally exclude disabled people
- Why lived experience is essential to designing accessible services
- What more inclusive financial systems could look like
- How technology, policy, and co-production can help drive meaningful change
Event details
Thursday 11 June 2026
1pm – 2:30pm
Online
Reflections on the event from Katie Brown, CAPA Intern
I found the Locked Out by Design panel to be interesting and informative. Throughout the seminar, the discussion was not focused solely on making digital finances more accessible but expanded on what that means in practice. Becks made the point at the beginning of the seminar that a bank can do everything in its power to create an accessible system. However, if those who need those available resources are unaware of them, the system is useless. As exciting as it is to finish a project and launch new software, companies should make a continued effort to support customers in the use of accessible features. Additionally, a flaw with several accessible designs is that they were not created alongside people with disabilities. Therefore, although they seem accessible, in reality they are not. During the panel, Ros advocated for including people with lived experience in accessible design and spoke about her challenges with the current card-dominant currency. People want to make anything they can more efficient, however, changes such as a business refusing to accept cash, can leave many individuals behind. That is not to say that there cannot be a shift to make life more efficient; it just must be done in an equitable way.
Another topic discussed by the panel was the idea that technology should be designed to increase autonomy and independence, not decrease it. Oftentimes, advances in technology require someone who has a disability to obtain further assistance rather than less. For businesses, this can lead to a loss of customers because people with disabilities do not want the extra burden that technological advances have caused. Specifically, in terms of finances, this idea of independence is important. Paul stated that money and health are deeply linked. Without easy access to their money, a person with disabilities struggles in terms of quality of life. They are unable to buy their favourite food or do more than just window shopping. Many people with disabilities may have health concerns, and there is no need to add to their vulnerability through the added stress around accessing their finances.
In relation to security, the panel had insightful comments. Accessibility is typically not one change that can be made, but rather the addition of options to create a space that serves many different needs. Security questions can be difficult to remember, and different financial institutions use various methods for keeping an account secure. Becks spoke on the topic that switching designs is not the automatic fix for accessibility. She used the example of changing bank security to Face ID for every user. However, there are some people with disabilities that are unable to use Face ID. Therefore, to ensure that software is accessible for a range of different people, choices are important.
I am glad that I attended this seminar. I use my online and mobile banking almost every day. So, this panel contained information that pushed me to think about how banks have changed in my lifetime and the systems that are currently used and their accessibility or lack thereof.











